March Madness

Normally this refers to Basketball,

which involves a tournament.

There are reasons Sarah Palin is not in the running.

She is only in the change game.

And that is a shame.

Simply put: Put up or shut up!

Get in the Republican race and you can have your debate.

Short of that, someone should accept her challenge.

And I don't mean Hillary or Katie*.

Meanwhile, Sarah Palin might do well to find out what a debate entails.

Even Comedy Central or MSNBC, should not be considered as early round qualifiers for the Final Four.**

* The Colbert Report or No Labels is not the shame, but Olympia Snow did come up. Being an enemy does not make you a candidate or a debater, let alone a journalist.

**Who would compete in this evolution?[i.e. Who would stoop to taking Sarah Palin serious let alone qualified to debate. Not that that would qualify her to advance to a final debate round. There was so much C-rap here, I thought I would d'ribble the punch line. Wouldn't we love Palin to actually debate*** someone of her watch-ama gotcha?]

[But speaking of tournaments, I don't think the Raw Money Class wants to be facing Obama anytime too soon.]

*** Buddy Roemer has left the building. Not to mention Gary Johnson.(C-Hillary Link*/see "actually debate" links.)

[3-21-12 Robert Reich ponders run.]

No Frackin' Way

Nuclear power is one thing*, but Frackin' with our water?

* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]

** way
*** last frackin' link

[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]

The Answering Machine...

message to the 3AM wake up call.
OBAMA AND FREEDOM

Said Relief?

Who said, he Said, they said.

Egypt Update.
Speaking of Journalism** or freedom's intent.
Other Associations and Said Groups...

Note preemptive nature of links, as not all are read fully nor sometimes more than scrolled over.

In that vein, here is another mid-read comment--
--
The Prophet Margin* or "Decartes Bones"(not 2 mention) quote:(p.XIX)

Most people seem to be caught between these tidal currents--the pull to faith and tradition in a dangerous world, the argument that religion is at the core of the world's problems and only a revived commitment to individual freedoms and rights will steer humanity into a better future.

Colin Slee said about England:"You have a triangle with fundamentalist secularists in one corner, fundamentalist faith people in another, and then the intelligent, thinking liberals of Anglicanism, Roman Catholicism, baptism and methodism, other faiths--and, indeed, thinking atheists--in the other corner."

--

* my characterization although I do not necessarily appreciate the characterizations that follow, but it is the Ge Oh Me Try, not to mention who is at the table.

** link lost in editing(still looking) maybe found.
[along the same line, the first link is too embedded in comment on journalism and comment, while the last link on "freedoms"(edit to possessive)is embedded with preemptive history and irony
(ex. Alexander Hamilton against the Bill of Rights, yet for a National Bank.)]
[Journalism link now replaced and here is an un-embedded link from it.]

Speaking of Relief:or spin zones or characterizations. 'nO'Really!

[Said Review: Post an achronism. (Relative to perspectivism)]

Axe not what you can

do to your country, but what your hatchet can do for you.
Cindi Lauper is like who?
Original: In Your End Oh?*
Butt up boom...

But seriously folks. God is mentioned once, in each/(either) of the two founding documents. Con text aside...( a big aside) A search of each document did not find Judeo-Christian, Christ, Jesus or Jews in either. This points directly to the mind play that is not based on the word.

* an alternative subtitle was lost, by Jove.

George had a hatchet and only nicked the tree in the likely fable. Lop her Oh Really? Wierd word play.

Again I found these links, after my Franklin and Adams references.[**]

[Original Emailed 5-7-10 sans opening line: Only slightly recrafted today with Post-Weak-End comments and link.]

[**] refers to earlier yet to be incorporated emails. Well actually there is a pre-Lob her Palin Franklin reference here last paragraph under security. [In a search for our freedoms as taken advantage of by terrorists, the proper link was hard to find. But it was lost and found under our freedoms.]

[Update: the first two links have expired. Found proxies.(Current Stand-Ins) Following them I also edit "each" to "either", for math and English sake. ]

Calvin...

and Hobbes or
Pee Wee Pulpit?
[Infinity in Retrospect] i. e. "and back again"

Re: Ribble to Read? See Obsolescence.

[To the heart of the matter... see "also"@who knows!]
My direct meaning is that if they read the full context there is nothing to fear but fear itself, but that brings back Roosevelt too clearly for some. Even if they don't like either Teddy or Franklin speaking of Red.

Fungible Heading.

Fungible - Sabbatical

White House: TARP Money Might Not Be Traceable
This is a misleading headline. The words "traceable" or "untraceable" were not used by Gibbs in yesterday's briefing.
They know where the money went. They were then unable to follow it. *
Gibbs: "...It's a little bit of a push and pull, right -- is the economy going to expand until or unless a small business can get the credit it needs to expand, and vice versa." **

* italics all my words.
** both bold mine

[Speaking of push and pull: Investigator Rules Against Palin in Ethics Probe I mean, why is it so expensive to defend against frivolous claims? And which comes first the dismissal or the legal fees? And is the law followable or traceable by Republicans and vice verse us?***]

*** not to mention "a check of her accounting" and the media's not mentioning that although only 1 of 19 charges have been successful the bulk of her bills (see oops) was to mislead (Oops, that's fungible as the expenses were Alaska's(not her bills) in investigating her false claim regarding the successful "troopergate".)

Rough Draft (Update/not)

[Posted AS IS 7-15-09]
democrats come through?: Reid to Baucus The Magic Number?
My original number included some strategy where 41 Democrats can maintain a filibuster but without Republicans presenting anything but opposition it is hard to see progress. But the magic is that Democrats do not need 60 votes to pass a bill, only to end a filibuster. Those are separate questions and in fact supported by the Democratic aversion to supporting a filibuster.

Obama's Clueless Liberal Critics Bruce Bartlett The Daily Beast7-8-09
pre-footnoted
1-12-09
1-28-09
1-28-09
Bang for the Buck

Update

Biden Ignores Warnings Of Krugman, Stiglitz, Roubini And Others HuffPo

Voodoo Economics Retro Redux: Reagan Recession Stimulus myths.
[7-7-09: Palin v. Myth
Cheney privileged leak to future Franken trippin.
See Voodoo Recession above Re:trippin.]

[It should be apparent that Republicans are totally incompetent if they can understand that a current administration can own the economy let alone the debt of a previous administration. It certainly is not apparent that Democrats are having it all their way. (search needs and eating their own)]
[see oopssee]
[Palin panel and strategy on The Ed Show 7-6-09 And Re: magic number ]

Not to mention...

Left, Right and Center.

I really did not know there was one.;-)

Speaking of not...
some sorting I don't need to.

Not to mention - optimists.

Label (VII)

LABELS

Tinkering...

and filing(see hiatus)

While I endorse Air America and Progressive Talk Radio, I am sometimes embarrassed by the extent to which they can go.

Even the likes of Jerry Springer *agrees that the likes of Palin should be handled better.

Speaking of better**...

[This will not be my tinkering page, but I did file some things, and I will note that I strongly recommend the Jerry Springer and the new DNC Chair Gov. Tim Kaine (the aster risked***) material, which I hope will stand the test of history or youtube.]

*** [* and ** are the recommended youtubes] While *** is my aster risked play on wordology. Play being spur of the moment tangents later searched. [But I caution and here is a hint (Lionel) that there is both the "zenith and nadir" of talk here, and one of those cases where I have preemptively linked.]